Televised Presidential Debates in a Changing Media Environment [2 volumes]
byEdward A. Hinck, PhD, is professor of communication at Central Michigan University. He teaches undergraduate courses in advocacy and leadership as well as graduate courses in rhetorical criticism and communication theory.
-
eBook
9781440850448
MLA
Edward A. Hinck. Televised Presidential Debates in a Changing Media Environment [2 volumes]. Praeger, 2018. ABC-CLIO, publisher.abc-clio.com/9781440850448.
Chicago Manual of Style
Edward A. Hinck. Televised Presidential Debates in a Changing Media Environment [2 volumes]. Praeger, 2018. http://publisher.abc-clio.com/9781440850448
APA
Edward A. Hinck. (2018). Televised Presidential Debates in a Changing Media Environment [2 volumes]. Retrieved from http://publisher.abc-clio.com/9781440850448
- Description
-
This two-volume set examines recent presidential and vice presidential debates, addresses how citizens make sense of these events in new media, and considers whether the evolution of these forms of consumption is healthy for future presidential campaigns—and for democracy.
• Examines research on presidential debates from 2004 to 2016, and considers how these debates—and elections—were affected by the changing media environment of each election season• Assesses the impact of U.S. citizens using social media to make sense of the campaign debates
• Considers whether the established presidential debate format is no longer effective for informing voters in a time of unprecedented political polarization and voter cynicism
• Applies different methods of analyzing the debates that will interest rhetorical scholars, argumentation scholars, and political communication scholars
- Table of Contents
-
Table of Contents
Televised Presidential Debates in a Changing Media Environment [2 volumes]
Author(s): Edward A. HinckContributors: Hinck, Edward;Abstract:This two-volume set examines recent presidential and vice presidential debates, addresses how citizens make sense of these events in new media, and considers whether the evolution of these forms of consumption is healthy for future presidential campaigns—and for democracy.
• Examines research on presidential debates from 2004 to 2016, and considers how these debates—and elections—were affected by the changing media environment of each election season• Assesses the impact of U.S. citizens using social media to make sense of the campaign debates
• Considers whether the established presidential debate format is no longer effective for informing voters in a time of unprecedented political polarization and voter cynicism
• Applies different methods of analyzing the debates that will interest rhetorical scholars, argumentation scholars, and political communication scholars
Editor(s): Hinck, Edward;SortTitle: televised presidential debates in a changing media environment [2 volumes]Author Info:Edward A. HinckeditorEdward A. Hinck, PhD, is professor of communication at Central Michigan University. He teaches undergraduate courses in advocacy and leadership as well as graduate courses in rhetorical criticism and communication theory.
eISBN-13: 9781440850448Cover Image URL: ~~FreeAttachments/9781440850448.jpgPrint ISBN-13: 9781440850431Imprint: PraegerPages: 728Publication Date: 20181130- Cover Cover11
- Volume 1: The Candidates Make Their Case Vol 1:iii4
- Title Vol 1:iii4
- Copyright Vol 1:iv5
- Contents Vol 1:vii8
- Acknowledgments Vol 1:xi12
- Introduction: Presidential Campaign Debates in a Changing Media Environment Vol 1:114
- Chapter 1: The Traditions and Expectations of Presidential Debates Vol 1:2235
- Chapter 2: Do/How Might Presidential Debates Matter? Learning from 2012 Vol 1:4659
- Part One: Studies of the 2004 Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates Vol 1:6982
- Chapter 3: Incumbent and Challenger Influences on Argument Strategies in Presidential Debates Vol 1:7184
- Chapter 4: Don’t Misunderestimate the Power of Debates: How the 2004 Presidential Debates Reinforced George W. Bush as the Moral Choice Vol 1:97110
- Chapter 5: It Was Not about the Issues: Ethos in the 2004 Presidential Debates Vol 1:119132
- Part Two: Studies of the 2008 Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates Vol 1:141154
- Part Three: Studies of the 2012 Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates Vol 1:163176
- Part Four: Studies of the 2016 Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates Vol 1:203216
- Chapter 9: Representing Class in Presidential Debates, 2008–2016 Vol 1:205218
- Chapter 10: The 2016 Presidential Debates as Public Argument Vol 1:228241
- Chapter 11: Hillary Rodham Clinton Negotiates Gender in the Debates of 2016 Vol 1:249262
- Chapter 12: The Year of the Alpha Male Writ Large: The Gender Dynamics of the 2016 Election and the Presidential Debates Vol 1:271284
- Chapter 13: The Effects of Debate Viewing on Candidate Image Perceptions in the 2016 Televised Presidential General Election Debates Vol 1:292305
- Part Five: Assessing Debate Discourse Vol 1:319332
- Chapter 14: The “People’s Debate”: Has the Town Hall Format Delivered on Its Grand Promise? Vol 1:321334
- Chapter 15: Female Voters and the Perception of Presidential Leadership in Politeness Strategies in the Debates from the 2000–2016 Presidential Campaigns Vol 1:342355
- Chapter 16: Civil Dialogue®: A New Lens through Which to View Presidential Debates Vol 1:367380
- About the Editor and Contributors Vol 1:385398
- Index Vol 1:393406
- Volume 2: The Citizens Talk Back Vol 2:iii418
- Title Vol 2:iii418
- Copyright Vol 2:iv419
- Contents Vol 2:vii422
- Acknowledgments Vol 2:ix424
- Introduction: Presidential Campaign Debates in a Changing Media Environment Vol 2:1426
- Part One: The Changing Audience for Televised Debates Vol 2:21446
- Chapter 1: Ruining the Debates in 140 Characters or Fewer: The Demophobic Response to Popular Punditry during the 2012 Presidential Debates Vol 2:23448
- Chapter 2: Interruptions as Rhetorical Leverage in Presidential Debate: Twitter as an Aid to Understanding the Rhetorical Power of Transgressive Behaviors in Presidential Campaigns Vol 2:40465
- Chapter 3: Social Media in the 2016 Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates Vol 2:59484
- Part Two: Using New Media to Combat Marginalization Vol 2:85510
- Part Three: How Citizens Talk Back in New Media Vol 2:129554
- Part Four: Memes of Memorable Debate Moments: Significant Campaign Discourse or Distractions from the Issues? Vol 2:177602
- Chapter 8: Beautiful Human Sweater Memes: Internet Memes as Vernacular Responses to Presidential Debates Vol 2:179604
- Chapter 9: Memes, Political Rhetoric, and Discursive Agency in the 2012 Vice Presidential Debate Vol 2:203628
- Chapter 10: Reframing the Rhetorical Meme-ing: The Enthymematic Form of “Binders Full of Women” Internet Memes from the October 16, 2012, Presidential Debate Vol 2:221646
- Chapter 11: Debating Memes: Networked Democracy and the Politics of Cynical Laughter Vol 2:243668
- Part Five: Enhancing the Citizen’s Stake in Consuming Presidential Debates: New Media’s Impact on the Quality of Political Discourse Vol 2:263688
- About the Editor and Contributors Vol 2:285710
- Index Vol 2:291716