8 Reading Engagement for Tweens and Teens I might recommend reading for an hour a day where pos­si­ble, though this sug- gestion can be met with incredulity, as though an hour is a ­ really long time. When we compare this suggestion with the amount of time young ­people typically spend on online recreational pursuits such as watching videos, chatting on social network- ing forums, and playing games online, which are not strongly associated with educative benefit (and may even pose health risks) (Merga, 2015b), it is not actu- ally that unreasonable a suggestion. However, we want reading to be associated with plea­sure and enjoyment, so simply demanding that ­ children or students read for recreation an hour a day is unlikely to yield a positive result in terms of foster- ing a lifelong reader, ­ unless this expectation is balanced with consideration of how to support the child to both find and access books that are enjoyable and at an acces- sible skill level. LITERACY, OPPORTUNITY, AND TESTING I would like to return to the advantages of regular reading and its links to achieve- ment. Literacy is strongly related to academic per­for­mance beyond lower school (Daggett & Hasselbring, 2007 Marks, McMillan, & Hillman, 2001). While liter- acy has always been impor­tant for academic achievement, for better or for worse, increasing emphasis on international literacy testing and benchmarking has increased the visibility of current literacy levels. Literacy is also increasingly rec- ognized as an essential skill for achievement in other subjects beyond En­ glish (or En­ glish Language Arts). In the United States, the Common Core State Standards recognize the importance of literacy skills for achievement in subjects beyond the En­ glish Language Arts, positioning literacy as a cross-­ disciplinary responsibility: The Standards insist that instruction in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and lan- guage be a shared responsibility within the school. The K–5 standards include expec- tations for reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language applicable to a range of subjects, including but not limited to ELA. The grades 6–12 standards are divided into two sections, one for ELA and the other for history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. This division reflects the unique, time-­ honored place of ELA teachers in developing students’ literacy skills while at the same time recognizing that teachers in other areas must have a role in this development as well. (Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO], 2010, p. 4) U.S. research has increasingly focused on developing literacy skills across core areas other than En­ glish (as explored in Heller & Greenleaf, 2007). Similarly, in Australia, the relatively new Australian Curriculum positions literacy as a Gen- eral Capability, to be demonstrated across all learning areas, including every­thing from math and science to sport. This recognition gives credence to the role that literacy has always played in other areas for instance, a child who fails a math test based on word prob­lems may fail due to poor reading comprehension rather than low numeracy skills. This is one of the reasons that literacy skills are not just about per­for­mance in the En­glish classroom or even in writing. Literacy skills are abso- lutely foundational, gateway skills to achievement across the subjects. Since 2003, U.S. ­ children in grades 4 and 8 have participated in reading assess- ments that test a range of literacy skills, such as reading comprehension and
Previous Page Next Page