10 Relax, It’s Just Sex
put their car keys in a bag or box and ­ women ­ later blindly pulled out a set
to determine who they would go home with) introduced a random ­factor
into the pro­cess, and “social clubs” ­ were developed as meeting and greet-
ing places for ­couples looking for like-­minded ­others to negotiate trades.
The sexual revolution of the 1960s ushered in a time of permissiveness
in which ­ couples began experimenting with reducing or eliminating rela-
tionship restrictions. The notion that sex and love should be given unre-
strictedly was a primary value of the “­free love” era of the 1970s, a time
in  which many ­couples began to explore the concept of consensual
non-­monogamy.17­
After a return to more conservative relationship values in the 1980s, the
cultural values pendulum again started a swing ­ toward the more liberal
end of the continuum in the 1990s with the rise of the “recreational sex”
movement. (For a good time, call up Em & Lo’s humorous dictionary of
rec sex terms.)18
In the 1990s, many urban singles opted off the traditional relationship
trajectory and instead developed networks of “friends with benefits.” Evolv-
ing a somewhat novel variant to the exclusivist model, ­ these individuals
continued to date several ­ others in­def­i nitely without making significant
restrictive commitments to anyone; for some, this pattern became a more-­
or-­less permanent and preferred lifestyle.
For ­ couples, the end of the last millennium saw the beginnings of an
upsurge of interest in exploring ways in which the partners may be con-
sensually more receptive to sexual/romantic engagements with ­others
without sacrificing their primary relationship. By the end of the first de­cade
of this ­ century, the prevalence of involvement in such non-­traditional rela-
tionship arrangements such as open marriages, polyamory, and three-(or
more)somes had reached a level of popularity that it now may be regarded
as a new counterculture.
Agreements
“Harmony is pure love,
For love is complete agreement.”19
—­Lope de Vega ­
Every ­ couple has some kind of agreement that defines their relation-
ship. In fact, it could be argued that if ­there ­were no agreement, ­there ­
wouldn’t be a ­ couple, just two individuals, each ­ doing what­ever he or she
wanted with no regard for the other.
Previous Page Next Page